In a new conversation Hyperalergic, Erik AF Clint, Hilma AF Klint Foundation and the artist’s top president, doubled that the body of the late artist of the Swedish artist had completely removed the medicine of institutions and commercials.
To mention the clause in one of the foundation statutes, initially he told the Swedish news store Current news Hilm creations cannot be classified as a work of art, as a transcript of communications with the spiritual world, argued that only the demands of the spiritual demands that meet the criteria established by the Foundation.
In a telephone call Hyperalergic This weekend, Erik also expressed the fourth statute established by his grandfather (the nephews of the month, who inherited the artist’s work and developed the foundation in 1972. Translated from Sweden, the Statute ruins the Foundation Commission to fulfill the work that requires those who seek spiritual knowledge or the work that completed the spiritual guide in the future in the future. ”
The Statute has noted the “Commission shall take care of the work to use only people with a sympathetic attitude towards the purpose of the base and who will not misuse.”
Erik became the president of the Foundation only two years ago, he said Hyperalergic “The two parts of this paragraph are equal,” it noted that the second sentence of the statute determines that the Hilm heritage is not only for a certain subset of people and not the general public.
“I can’t forget one or the other,” he continued. “That’s what has been done for many years, but when they started selling the art of Hilma’s art and NFTS, it’s been too much.”
In 2023, Erik presented the case against other Committee members and the General Director of the Foundation, accusing the Hilma’s heritage to win, with NFTS and the original works sold to NFTS. (It is not immediately clear that the case is against other committee members, David Zwirner replaced the representative of the Foundation. This February, in this February, submitted a request to the Stockholm District’s request to resign.
As for the foundation rules, the board of the Board must be the descendant of the artist and most of the trustees must be members of anthroposophical society. Hilma took great interest in some alternative spiritual movements of his life.
While the Foundation also supports the sale of certain works of the Hilma’s 1,300 paintings, it is possible to finance the conservation of other works in the collection, Erik denounced any of his works, which works that artists do not want to be separated or commercialized.
“I’m against four committee members, and we are democracy.” The only way to protect the statutes is to go to Swedish authorities and “My table does not adhere to the foundation laws”.
From organizations and galleries to pull his work completely, Erik said Hyperalergic That’s a holy body of the work, and he wrote and sketched itself after a “spiral-shaped temple, after ordering his paintings.
For abstract and indirect matter, Hilma’s heritage was created for relative darkness, after the 2018 relative exhibition at the New York Solomon Museum New York.
“I think there is a meaning, so when God all seemed to see the dead in this way, it has been a goal,” he continued Erik. “And it was interested in creating. When the people are removed from the people, the people who are true-seekers will come and build the temple. They will be the value to look at physical art, knowing that [there] You can go to see nowhere else in the world. “
In a shared expression of a spokesman, the Hilma AF KLint Foundation committees Ulf Wagner, Voto Katarina de Voto, Juhani Selvani and Anders Kumlander indicated that “majority [of the board] He believes that Hilma should be available for public art and researchers, “and has warned that the Foundation has set out an external study to explore the possibility of developing the sustainable house of Hilma’s creations.
“However, there have been discussions on the interpretation of the foundation’s interpretation. The Commission has been investigating this issue for several years and concludes that the text must be interpreted in a contemporary contextual context.”
The Board said the last to speak of the Statutes, he said they retain the said research and are working at the disposal of those who want to see and learn from Hilma – “as the previous committee has been made as years.”
The members of the Board did not comment on Erik’s final application and the Foundation continues his work despite continuous debate.
